BIOL101 A case study/case history (Approved by the instructor) related to any disease which is common in Saudi Arabia | Academics Help

Guidelines for Group topic presentation:
“Each group will choose a case study/case history (Approved by the instructor) related to any disease which is common in Saudi Arabia”
Content for slides:
First slide must contain presentation cover page (Attached)
Explanation about the case study (4-5 slides)
Medical terms (15 terms minimum) used in case study in tabular form: (1- Medical Term, 2- Prefix (if available), 3- Root, 4- Suffix, 5- Basic explanation of the term). Group can add other medicals terms related to the disease even not mentioned in the case study/case history to complete 15 terms. (3-4 slides)
References (last slide)
Instructions:
Each group has to prepare maximum 10-12 PPT slides excluding cover page slide for the assigned topic.
The group shall be provided maximum 15 minutes to present the topic including question /answer session
The group will be graded as per the “Presentation Marking Rubric”
Presentation Marking Rubric (Group)
2.5
1.5
1
0.50
Mark
Visual Appeal
There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide.
Visually appealing/engaging.
There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on two or more slides.
Significant visual appeal.
There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information was contained on many slides.
Minimal effort made to make slides appealing or too much going on.
There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. The slides were difficult to read and too much information had been copied onto them.
No visual appeal.
2.5

Comprehension
Extensive knowledge of topic.
Members showed complete understanding of assignment. Accurately answered all questions posed.
Most showed a good understanding of topic.
All members able to answer most of audience questions.
Few members showed good understanding of some parts of topic.
Only some members accurately answered questions.
Presenters didn’t understand topic.
Majority of questions answered by only one member or majority of information incorrect.
2.5
Content
The presentation was a concise summary of the topic with all questions answered. Comprehensive and complete coverage of information.
The presentation was a good summary of the topic.
Most important information covered; little irrelevant info.
The presentation was informative but several elements went unanswered.
Much of the information irrelevant; coverage of some of major points.
The presentation was a brief look at the topic but many questions were left unanswered.
Majority of information irrelevant and significant points left out.
2.5
Preparedness/
Participation/
Group Dynamics
All presenters knew the information, participated equally, and helped each other as needed.
Extremely prepared and rehearsed.
Slight domination of one presenter. Members helped each other.
Very well prepared.
Significant controlling by some members with one minimally contributing.
Primarily prepared but with some dependence on just reading off slides.
Unbalanced presentation or tension resulting from over-helping.
Multiple group members not participating.
Evident lack of preparation/rehearsal. Dependence on slides.
2.5
Total
10