Sharing vision and prioritizing needs Academic Help
I’m trying to study for my Law course and I need some help to understand this question.
No plagiarism. it will be checked. Be thorough and use references. Please hit distinguished on the scoring guide in all groups.
Leaders breathe life into visions. The ways in which leaders model expectations, communicate visions, and engage in actions that align with those expectations will have a significant impact on how others buy in. Leaders must animate visions, so that others can experience what it would be like to live and work in that ideal and unique future. It is also essential for leaders to look ahead to the future. Looking ahead is integral to leadership success. Kouzes and Posner wrote that being forward-looking is not the same as meeting deadlines; leaders have to prospect the future.
In your main post:
- Elaborate on how leaders breathe life into visions.
- Describe three ways a leader can accomplish animation of visions specific to criminal justice.
- Explain the difference between a leader being forward-looking and meeting deadlines.
- Propose three ways a leader can prospect the future specific to criminal justice.
Scoring guide
| Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Discussion Post Response (60%) | ||||
| Apply critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. 50% |
Does not apply elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. | Applies some elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. | Applies critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. | Applies critical thinking or problem solving to the main discussion post in a comprehensive, step-by-step manner. |
| Use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. 10% |
Does not use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. | Responds to the discussion, but some or all of the resources used for support are not credible. | Uses credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. | Uses well- developed, relevant support from credible resources or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion and impartially considers conflicting data or other perspectives. |
| Follow-up Post Response One (15%) | ||||
| Advance the discussion with a substantive response that asks questions, assesses further considerations, or provides a different point of view. 15% |
Does not respond to the discussion beyond the initial post. | Provides a substantive response, but does not advance the discussion by asking questions, assessing further considerations, or providing a different point of view. | Advances the discussion with a substantive response that asks questions, assesses further considerations, or provides a different point of view. | Advances the discussion with a substantive response that contains well- supported and fully developed positions and perspectives that support or conflict with the original post. |
